Martech
The Martech Utilization Crisis Is Not a Vendor Problem
Gartner's 33% utilization figure gets cited constantly. What doesn't get said: the problem isn't the platform. It's the absence of a strategy to use it.
Every year, Gartner publishes its CMO Spend Survey. Every year, the martech utilization number drops. In 2020, organizations used roughly 58% of their marketing technology capabilities. By 2023, that number had fallen to 33%. The vendor response has been predictable: better onboarding, more professional services, enhanced support packages.
None of that addresses the actual problem. The utilization gap isn't a product failure. It's a strategy failure — and specifically, the failure to connect platform capability to business outcomes before the contract is signed.
How Organizations End Up Here
The typical pattern: a platform gets selected on feature parity against a requirements list. The requirements list was built from the gaps in the previous platform. The new platform checks all the boxes. Implementation happens. Utilization stalls at 30–40% within 18 months.
The requirements list captured features, not use cases. Use cases require a content strategy, a measurement framework, an analytics architecture, and a team with the skills to operate the system. Most organizations buy the platform before building any of those.
Average martech utilization — Gartner, 2023
33% of martech capabilities currently used
The Org Chart Problem
Marketing technology typically sits at the intersection of marketing, IT, and operations — which means it functionally belongs to no one. Marketing doesn't own the technical configuration. IT doesn't own the content strategy. Operations doesn't own either. The platform sits in the gap.
The question is not "does your team know how to use the platform?" It's "does your team have a clear mandate, the content to publish, the analytics to measure, and the authority to optimize?" Usually the answer to at least two of those is no.
What Actually Closes the Gap
Platform utilization improves when three things exist simultaneously: a content strategy that drives demand for the platform's capabilities, an analytics framework that creates accountability for outcomes, and someone with both the strategic authority and technical fluency to connect the two.
- Audit what you're actually using — not what's licensed
- Map each unused capability to a stated business objective
- Identify the content, data, or skills gap blocking each use case
- Build a phased activation plan, not a feature checklist
- Assign ownership — not just a team, a named individual
This is not a technology problem. It never was. The platform does what it was designed to do. The question is whether the organization has the strategy, the content, and the operational discipline to use it.
Work with Berchtold
If this is the gap you’re living with, let’s talk.
We work with businesses that have real marketing problems — not ones looking for a vendor to fill a slot. A consultation costs nothing. Clarity does.

